Monday, March 9, 2015

Weed Control for Sports Fields

What's the best way to control weeds on your sports field?

Jared Hoyle, a turfgrass professor from Kansas State University, offered up the answer at the beginning of his seminar, "Advanced Weed Control for Athletic Turf," with a simple but sensible answer.

"Managing turf properly is the best control you can have against weeds," stated Hoyle, who spoke at the Sports Turf Managers Association's Conference and Exhibition in January.

But, as Hoyle stressed, you must do your due diligence. For starters, a field's turf needs to contain the appropriate turfgrass variety to be properly managed. If the field is in the shade, it should contain a shade-tolerant variety, Hoyle said, citing the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (www.ntep.org) as an excellent source to find the right variety.

Proper irrigation is vital to achieving properly managed turf, Hoyle added.  "If you irrigate too much, you can stimulate weed germination and do more harm than good," he added, suggesting a strategy of deep and infrequent irrigation to stimulate root growth.

Hoyle said proper mowing provides excellent weed control, but he noted that each turf species has its own range of tolerance. For instance, if turf is mowed below that range of tolerance, it can thin and be overtaken by weeds. If it's mowed above range, and leaf blades are left to hold more moisture, the turf is more susceptible to disease and may appear puffy.

For the best results, Hoyle suggested field managers mow every five to seven days, and avoid midday mowing when heat stress can occur.

Hoyle noted there's good news and bad news with bagging clippings. The good news is bagging them may reduce weed seeds; the bad news is that it also robs turf of nitrogen, so field managers who bag clippings should fertilize 25 percent more annually.

Fertilization also plays an important role in properly managed turf, with rates varying depending on environmental conditions and soil type. When fertilization is right, the turf experiences more root growth than top growth, Hoyle noted.

Cultural practices, such as thatch control and aerification, are also important, he added.

Friday, February 20, 2015

Could the Southeast be faced with sod shortages in 2015?

Dr. Grady Miller, Professor of Crop Science and Extension Specialist at North Carolina State University reports that in recent discussions with North Carolina sod growers it was apparent that there will be a significant shortage of bermudagrass sod this winter and spring. But he added, with good growing conditions the growers may be able to catch up in early to mid-summer.
Why shortages when just five years ago inventory levels were relatively high? There have been multiple factors involved. There was already reduced sod acreage following the downturn in the economy. The increase in construction over the last year and a rapid switch to a preference for bermudagrass by builders has contributed to the shortage. Add to that the poor summer growing conditions (prolonged springs and limited light) for warm-season grasses the last two years and the result is a depleted supply of bermudagrass.
A recent sod survey from the University of Georgia indicates they too have a similar supply shortfall. (http://www.caes.uga.edu/applications/gafaces/?public=viewStory&pk_id=4996)
Dr. Clint Waltz, Turfgrass Extension Specialist at the University of Georgia is quoted as saying, “Several growers have told me that strong fall sales have dropped their inventories of warm-season grasses down to levels lower than they commonly experience in the first five months of the year.” Sod growers in the southeast suggest this shortage is universal across the region.
What does this mean? All growers, regardless of size and location, will not have adequate bermudagrass sod to meet the demand. Miller suggests, “This will likely result in an increase in bermudagrass sod cost. In some cases, if sod must be installed during this period, the buyer may have to select an alternative grass.”

Texas Water Development Board publishes study on drought indicators

The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) in coordination with The University of Texas at Austin's Jackson School of Geosciences announces the publication of a study on indicators for the early warning of drought in Texas.
The study observed that certain climatic conditions in the spring, such as atmospheric pressure and soil moisture, can be used to better predict drought over Texas in the summer. The study participants developed a statistical model that is about 70 percent effective in predicting summer precipitation. The model successfully predicted rainfall conditions for last summer. "If we can predict summer drought in April, or as early as January, water providers have more time to prepare," explained the lead author of the study, Dr. Nelun Fernando of the Texas Water Development Board.
"I am proud of the critical component of water science at TWDB," said TWDB Chairman Carlos Rubinstein. "We are the state agency charged with developing sound science for water planning. The important work of our scientists helps with both long-term planning and near-term potential drought response."
The research that supported this study was funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. "The long-term collaboration between NASA, the Jackson School, and the Texas Water Development Board was tremendous," said Rong Fu, a professor at the Jackson School of Geosciences and the project̢۪s principal investigator.
"In addition to our science programs, TWDB offers many financial assistance programs to help water suppliers respond to drought conditions," said Rubinstein. "Our programs, including the State Water Implementation Fund for Texas (SWIFT), the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF), and the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF), are available to provide communities with drought response, water infrastructure, and water quality improvements."

The Best Remedy for Weed Control Is....

What's the best way to control weeds on your sports field?

Jared Hoyle, a turfgrass professor from Kansas State University, offered up the answer at the beginning of his seminar, "Advanced Weed Control for Athletic Turf," with a simple but sensible answer.

"Managing turf properly is the best control you can have against weeds," stated Hoyle, who spoke at the Sports Turf Managers Association's Conference and Exhibition in January.

But, as Hoyle stressed, you must do your due diligence. For starters, a field's turf needs to contain the appropriate turfgrass variety to be properly managed. If the field is in the shade, it should contain a shade-tolerant variety, Hoyle said, citing the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (www.ntep.org) as an excellent source to find the right variety.

Proper irrigation is vital to achieving properly managed turf, Hoyle added.  "If you irrigate too much, you can stimulate weed germination and do more harm than good," he added, suggesting a strategy of deep and infrequent irrigation to stimulate root growth.

Hoyle said proper mowing provides excellent weed control, but he noted that each turf species has its own range of tolerance. For instance, if turf is mowed below that range of tolerance, it can thin and be overtaken by weeds. If it's mowed above range, and leaf blades are left to hold more moisture, the turf is more susceptible to disease and may appear puffy.

For the best results, Hoyle suggested field managers mow every five to seven days, and avoid midday mowing when heat stress can occur.

Hoyle noted there's good news and bad news with bagging clippings. The good news is bagging them may reduce weed seeds; the bad news is that it also robs turf of nitrogen, so field managers who bag clippings should fertilize 25 percent more annually.

Fertilization also plays an important role in properly managed turf, with rates varying depending on environmental conditions and soil type. When fertilization is right, the turf experiences more root growth than top growth, Hoyle noted.

Cultural practices, such as thatch control and aerification, are also important, he added.

PROPER IDENTIFICATION REQUIRED

When diagnosing turfgrass problems, the first step is to ID the turfgrass species
Some years ago I was invited to a high school to help diagnose a problem on the infield of the school’s baseball field. Half of the turf was brown, with patches of dead grass scattered throughout the entire infield area. The immediate, knee-jerk reaction was to assume it was disease-related, since the symptoms were similar in nature to disease symptoms and it was August, when many diseases, such as brown patch and dollar spot, are active.
The first thing I do when diagnosing a turf problem is to identify the turfgrass. The dead/dying grass on the infield was Kentucky bluegrass, and the healthy looking grass was perennial ryegrass. Kentucky bluegrass is susceptible to summer patch disease, but perennial ryegrass isn’t. However, the symptoms didn’t look like summer patch, which show as circular patches or rings from 6 inches to 3 feet in diameter. The problem on the infield was more uniform and mottled. Upon close inspection of the turf, its crown and underlying roots, it quickly became apparent that the damage was caused by bluegrass billbugs, which lay their eggs in the crown of bluegrass plants, but not ryegrass plants.
Identifying a turf problem as a disease is challenging, since the disease organism is typically very small. Working through a series of clues, like a detective, will usually result in narrowing it down to the exact problem.
The first step is turfgrass identification, the next is an evaluation of environmental conditions, and the last is a learned knowledge of local diseases that could be the cause. These three steps are often referred to as the “disease triangle” (Figure 1), because in order for a disease to become a turfgrass problem each of these three components – turfgrass host, the right environment, pathogen – must be present.

When diagnosing turfgrass problems, the first step is to ID the turfgrass species
Some years ago I was invited to a high school to help diagnose a problem on the infield of the school’s baseball field. Half of the turf was brown, with patches of dead grass scattered throughout the entire infield area. The immediate, knee-jerk reaction was to assume it was disease-related, since the symptoms were similar in nature to disease symptoms and it was August, when many diseases, such as brown patch and dollar spot, are active.
The first thing I do when diagnosing a turf problem is to identify the turfgrass. The dead/dying grass on the infield was Kentucky bluegrass, and the healthy looking grass was perennial ryegrass. Kentucky bluegrass is susceptible to summer patch disease, but perennial ryegrass isn’t. However, the symptoms didn’t look like summer patch, which show as circular patches or rings from 6 inches to 3 feet in diameter. The problem on the infield was more uniform and mottled. Upon close inspection of the turf, its crown and underlying roots, it quickly became apparent that the damage was caused by bluegrass billbugs, which lay their eggs in the crown of bluegrass plants, but not ryegrass plants.
In order for a disease to become a turfgrass problem each of these three components – turfgrass host, the right environment, pathogen – must be present.
Identifying a turf problem as a disease is challenging, since the disease organism is typically very small. Working through a series of clues, like a detective, will usually result in narrowing it down to the exact problem.
The first step is turfgrass identification, the next is an evaluation of environmental conditions, and the last is a learned knowledge of local diseases that could be the cause. These three steps are often referred to as the “disease triangle” (Figure 1), because in order for a disease to become a turfgrass problem each of these three components – turfgrass host, the right environment, pathogen – must be present.

Turfgrass ID

Identifying the turfgrass plant is important because not all turfgrasses are susceptible to all diseases. Some turfgrasses are prone to only one or two diseases, and some, like perennial ryegrass, are prone to many (Table 1). Since so much perennial ryegrass is used on sports fields, a sports turf manager must always be vigilant, particularly during warm and humid weather. Perennial ryegrass is also used frequently as an overseeding tool, further exacerbating its susceptibility to seedling diseases like damping off (Pythium, Rhizoctonia and Fusarium spp.)

Disease environment

Temperature, humidity and leaf wetness/moisture are the environmental factors that drive disease incidence, and disease pathogens are active within certain known temperature ranges. Prediction models have been developed that predict when environmental conditions are right for a disease to occur. These prediction models are based predominantly on local weather data, namely temperature and humidity.
Turf damaged by billbugs is often mistaken as turf damaged by disease.
PHOTOS COURTESY OF PAMELA SHERRATT
For example, brown patch disease is most severe when the sum of the daytime and nighttime temperature exceeds 150, with 10 hours of continuous leaf wetness. If those environmental conditions exist and the cultivars of tall fescue on a sports field are particularly susceptible to the disease, then there is a high probability that brown patch will occur.
Dollar spot appears on fields that have low and deficient nitrogen.
In addition to the right temperature and humidity, diseases also need water to grow, infect and spread, and continuous leaf wetness offers the right environment for disease development. Turfgrass that stays wet because it’s watered too much, or covered regularly with plastic tarps, or growing in an environment with poor air circulation, has a greater risk of disease infection.
Another environmental factor that influences disease severity is soil fertility, particularly in regard to nitrogen status. There are diseases that occur if an excess of nitrogen has been applied. Examples include brown patch and Pythium blight. If there’s a history of brown patch on a field, it may be that too much nitrogen fertilizer has been applied.
Pythium blight can occur if nitrogen content is too high.
Conversely, some diseases, such as rust, red thread and dollar spot, occur on fields that have a low or deficient nitrogen status. Turfgrass that’s deficient in nitrogen is also unable to grow out of the disease symptoms and recover quickly. In most incidences these diseases can be prevented with a sound nitrogen fertilizer program.

Pathogen signs and symptoms

Turfgrass diseases are typically caused by fungal pathogens that spread by airborne or waterborne spores or vegetative hyphae. They’re generally microscopic and difficult to see. However, it’s possible to see signs of the disease. These include features like mycelium (the mass of white fungal threads produced by dollar spot), spore masses (rust) and sclerotia (hard mass of mycelium caused by gray snow mold). These signs are seen first thing in the morning, before the dew has dried, although some, like red thread and rust, linger a little longer into the day.

Winterkill of Turfgrass

“Winterkill” is a general term that is used to define turf loss during the winter. Winterkill can be caused by a combination of factors including crown hydration, desiccation, low temperatures, ice sheets and snow mold. Because of the unpredictability of environmental factors and differences in other factors such as surface drainage, the occurrence of winterkill on golf courses is variable and can vary greatly between golf courses and even across the same course.

Crown hydration

In general, annual bluegrass (Poa annua) greens and fairways are the most susceptible to crown hydration injury. During the warm days of late winter, annual bluegrass plants start to take up water (hydrate). Potential for injury exists when a day or two of warm daytime temperatures in late winter is followed by a rapid freeze. The most common time for winterkill associated with crown hydration and refreezing to occur is during the late winter and early spring when there is snowmelt or rainfall and then refreezing of the water that has not drained away. Crown hydration is a problem during these events because ice crystal can form in the crown of the plant, rupture the plant cells and ultimately cause the plant to die.

Annual bluegrass is more susceptible to crown hydration injury than creeping bentgrass because it emerges from dormancy and begins taking up water. Creeping bentgrass remains dormant longer and, therefore, does not take up water and is not as susceptible to crown hydration injury during the late winter.

Desiccation

Winter desiccation is the death of leaves or plants by drying during winter when the plant is either dormant or semidormant. Desiccation injury is usually greatest on exposed or elevated sites and areas where surface runoff is great (Beard, 1973). Winter desiccation injury to turfgrass in Michigan is normally rare, though sites similar to those described above can be prone to desiccation injury on a regular basis.

Low-temperature Kill

Low-temperature kill is caused by ice crystal formation at temperatures below 32 degrees F. Factors that affect low-temperature kill include hardiness level, freezing rate, thawing rate, number of times frozen and postthawing treatment (Beard, 1973). Soil temperature is more critical than air temperature for low-temperature kill because the crown of the plant is in the soil. It is difficult to provide absolute killing temperatures because of the numerous factors involved. Beard (1973) provided a general ranking of low-temperature hardiness for turfgrass species that were autumn-hardened.

Low-temperature hardinessTurfgrass species
ExcellentRough bluegrass
 Creeping bentgrass
GoodKentucky bluegrass
 Colonial bentgrass
MediumAnnual bluegrass
 Tall fescue
 Red fescue
PoorPerennial ryegrass

Ice sheets

Ice sheets are often blamed for killing turf when, in fact, it is crown hydration and subsequent refreezing that has resulted in the kill. The reason for the confusion is that, as snow melts and refreezes, creating ice sheets, the ice sheets are often in poorly drained areas where crown hydration can occur because of the standing water. As the ice sheet melts away, the area damaged closely mirrors where the ice occurred, and therefore, the conclusion is that ice sheets caused the kill. Beard conducted research on ice sheets on three turfgrass species: Kentucky bluegrass, creeping bentgrass and annual bluegrass. Kentucky bluegrass and creeping bentgrass survived 150 days of ice cover without significant injury; annual bluegrass was killed somewhere between 75 and 90 days of ice cover (Beard, 1998). The author concluded that cause of death for the annual bluegrass was most likely from toxic gas accumulation under the ice sheet.

Snow mold

The two diseases commonly called snow mold are Typhula blight (gray snow mold) and Microdochium patch (pink snow mold). Gray snow mold requires extended periods of snow cover; pink snow mold can occur either with or without snow cover. If snow mold injury is a recurring problem, preventive fungicide applications are the best control option.

Steps in recovery

To assess if damage has occurred, samples can be taken from turf areas, moved inside and placed in a warm, sunny area to see if the turf greens up. If there is no green-up within a couple of weeks, the turf was killed.

Reestablishing turfgrass in damaged areas can be very challenging in the spring because of the cool, cloudy conditions that often persist. Depending on the extent of damage, either seeding or sodding may be necessary to facilitate recovery. In areas where the turf was killed in a manner that left well-defined margins between dead and living turf, it may be feasible to strip dead turf and sod the area. In areas where the kill was more scattered, it may be easier to seed the area. Seeding can be difficult, especially on damaged areas of greens. Interseeding creeping bentgrass into dead areas on the greens has given mixed results. The best results with interseeding have occurred when the lowmow, high-density creeping bentgrasses, such as the A and G series bentgrasses, have been used. Tools such as the Job-Saver aerator attachment, which produces numerous small, shallow holes, also increase the success of an inter-seeding program. The interseeding process should continue weekly until the damaged area has completely recovered. On greens that are predominantly annual bluegrass, often it is better to scratch the surface of the dead areas to allow the annual bluegrass to germinate and fill in the voids. Keys to success for renovating winterkilled areas are to divert traffic from newly seeded areas, apply light fertilizer applications to stimulate growth, and irrigate to ensure that the seedbed or sod is moist throughout the establishment period.

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Nursery to replenish Waco's 'urban forest' with park trees

By J.B. SMITH jbsmith@wacotrib.com

Trees in Waco’s parks and public spaces have taken a beating in recent years from wind, drought and disease, but a project is afoot to replenish the “urban forest.”
The city of Waco is preparing to plant 700 saplings at a new city tree nursery near Waco Regional Airport, with plans to begin transplanting them in about five years.

Ultimately, the city nursery could have as many as 7,000 young trees and produce about 500 trees a year, city park Superintendent Burck Tollett said.
“We’re going to save about 50 percent on our tree costs, and we’re going to grow some trees you can’t easily get commercially,” Tollett said.
The nursery is an expansion of an experimental “urban forestry” program the city started a decade ago on vacant lots it acquired through tax sales near Orchard Lane in East Waco.
The lots lacked sewer, so the city couldn’t sell them. But the city had to mow them anyway, so crews planted and maintained trees such as bald cypress and bur oak.
In recent months, the city had a company dig up 62 trees and plant them at areas that had lost trees, such as Cameron Park, Buena Vista Park and the Herring Avenue median near North Fourth Street. Others were planted along the river at Brazos Park East.
The city is preparing to dig up another 96 trees from the site and plant them at parks such as Jaycees Park and Pioneer Park.
Tollett estimated that the total cost to the city of each 10-year-old tree planted will be $100. The city is preparing to replant trees on the vacant lots for future transplants.
The city plans to grow a variety of oaks, redbuds and pecans as well as hard-to-find trees such as pawpaw, gingko, Chinquapin oak and hickory.
About 700 pots of trees are waiting at a city greenhouse to be planted next month at the old Central Texas Zoo tract near the airport. The site has access to irrigation water.
Tollett said the trees will be planted in “grow bags” that can be easily pulled up after a few years without major damage to the root ball.
Tollett said many Waco parks need more shade trees, while others, such as Cameron Park, are in danger of losing some old trees.
For example, many of the pecan trees in Pecan Bottoms were planted a century ago as a memorial to fallen World War I soldiers, he said.
Ashley Millerd, program director at Keep Waco Beautiful, said the city’s nursery will help save money and make Waco a greener place to live.
“I love that they’re about to use some of the land near the airport,” she said. “It will beautify that area. It’s amazing what they’re doing. If we could do that and create a system for growing trees, we won’t have to spend so much buying trees.”